Varför användningen av till synes onödig profanitet i kungens tal?

2

Storleken på kungens tal är klart PG Rated , men den stora användningen av profanity-ord gjorde filmen RATED R. Men i motsats till den signifikanta förändringen från PG till R, verkade användningen av dessa skenhetsord ganska onödiga i filmen med stor inverkan på historien.

Vad lägger profaniteten till filmens historia och teman som gjorde det här beslutet verkar bra för filmskaparna? Finns det något ord från dem om det här eller någon ytterligare analys på hur denna IMHO-onödig skenhet läggs till filmen?

    
uppsättning The Hawk 10.06.2017 14:58

1 svar

4

Medan "profanity" kanske inte har lagt till någonting i storheten per se är det tydligen bara en möjlig teknik som används för att "härma" en stamare och det var den primära kampen som avbildades.

Effektiviteten är tvivelaktig dock ...

"The King's Speech" also touches upon the more ineffective therapies used during the time period, which included trying to speak with pebbles in the mouth and cursing up a storm to get the words out.

LiveScience.com

Another lesson is anger can produce fluency for someone who stutters. Albert is nearly always fluent when he is angry and cursing. So am I.

The Stuttering Foundation

Film citat

Lionel Logue: You don’t stammer when you swear.

En alternativ version av filmen utfärdades emellertid.

...the Weinstein Co was told that, if 3 of the 5 uses of the swear word “Fuck” were muted, then the pic would receive a lesser rating than its current “R”. No film footage was altered in keeping with director Tom Hooper’s insistence that the stammering king’s pivotal therapy-by-cursing scene not be cut. Deadline initially broke the news that The Weinstein Co was seeking the lower PG-13 film rating in response to educational and church groups who wanted to show the movie.

Deadline.com

This artistic, or rather commercial, license annoyed Firth, who on Oscar night told reporters, “I don’t support it. I think the film has integrity as it stands. I think that scene belongs where it is. I think it serves a purpose.” The cut version also stoked spasms of outrage in the college of critics. “For the benefit of a teensy portion of the population,” wrote John Serba of the Grand Rapids (Mich.) Press, “the artistic vision of director Tom Hooper is compromised …” Roger Ebert tweeted, “Today is the last day you can see ‘The King’s Speech’ with the F word. F**k!”

Time.com

R "-värdet användes inte i Storbritannien ... där det ursprungligen gavs en" 15 "rating som sedan nedgraderades

..BBFC later announced that its classification decision had been given "careful consideration" by its president and director. The board took the view it would be suitable for the less restrictive 12A rating. The BBFC added: "The public would understand why the board has reached this decision."

Colin Firth, who plays the reluctant king, said the context of the words was everything – that they were not being used in a sexual way or to insult or describe anyone. "It would be very interesting to know who the people are who would complain about that stuff ahead of violence."

Guardian.com

    
svaret ges 10.06.2017 15:15