Mot slutet av den nya Star Wars -filmen Force Awakens ,
Kylo Ren kills his father, Han Solo.
Den här händelsen orsakade mycket sorg bland fans som var förödade för att se denna karaktär, och filmskaparna väntade sig säkert en sådan reaktion.
Varför av universum var beslutet att döda bort denna karaktär?
JJ Abrams själv sa att detta är vad det handlade om:
Star Wars had the greatest villain in cinema history. So, how you bring a new villain into that world is a very tricky thing. We knew we needed to do something f—king bold. The only reason why Kylo Ren has any hope of being a worthy successor is because we lose one of the most beloved characters.
(Källa: denna intervju med Abrams och hans medförfattare Lawrence Kasdan och Michael Arndt.)
Kasdan utarbetade på den här punkten och sa att historien kunde ses som Kylo Rens ålderssaga: en skurkas ålder .
People always say, ‘Why do you think this saga is so popular?’ I really do believe the underlying theme is recognizing your potential and understanding what you’re capable of. It’s a quest we’re all on our entire lives. It doesn’t end. To understand what you’ve inherited, and what you like about that and what you don’t like about that. Have you fulfilled yourself completely — or is it too late? What is dormant? That’s a very real and tangible thing for people every day.
Och Abrams igen:
Long before we had this title, the idea of The Force Awakens was that this would become the evolution of not just a hero, but a villain. And not a villain who was the finished, ready-made villain, but someone who was in process.
[Han's death] is this massive tradeoff. How can we possibly do that!? But… if we hadn’t done that, the movie wouldn’t have any guts at all. It felt very dangerous.”
Den här gången citerade Arndt från samma intervju:
I had thought Han’s story and Leia’s story was just about them coming back together. At the end of the movie they would have reconciled and gotten over their differences. And you would have said, ‘Okay, bad stuff happened, but at least they’re back together again'. J.J. rightly asked, ‘What is Han doing in this movie?’ If we’re not going to have something important and irreversible happen to him, then he kind of feels like luggage. He feels like this great, sexy piece of luggage you have in your movie. But he’s not really evolving. He’s not really pushing the story forward.
Hur tog de olika personerna med att göra filmen det?
Harrison Ford själv verkar inte ha några problem. Han har varit kampanj för att få Han Solo dödad sedan Return of the Jedi :
Och i den ovannämnda intervjun bekräftade Abrams, med en avvisande handvåg:
Nah, he was fine.
Faktum är att Abrams själv var lite nervös för detta djärva drag, men Kasdans stöd stärkt hans beslut:
You [Kasdan] wrote some of the greatest lines that Han ever spoke, so there was a level of comfort in the danger. You were willing to go there, which made me feel like it wasn’t necessarily the worst idea.
"It was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away...I thought the best utility of the character would be for him to sacrifice himself to a high ideal and give a little bottom, a little gravitas to the enterprise, not that there wasn’t some already but I just wanted in on some part of it. That was at the third occasion of filming the original three."
( Källa )
Det verkar som om den här ideen äntligen användes i Kraftvakten .
J.J. Abrams egna förklaring är här :
"Long before we had this title, the idea of The Force Awakens was that this would become the evolution of not just a hero, but a villain. Star Wars had the greatest villain in cinema history. So, how you bring a new villain into that world is a very tricky thing. We knew we needed to do something f--king bold. The only reason why Kylo Ren has any hope of being a worthy successor is because we lose one of our most beloved characters."
Läs andra frågor om taggar star-wars the-force-awakens kylo-ren Kärlek och kompatibilitet Skor Gear 12 Stjärntecken Grunderna