Varför betraktas Gangs of New York som ett original manus?

10

Från Wikipedia :

Gangs of New York is inspired by Herbert Asbury's 1927 non-fiction book, The Gangs of New York.

Varför Gangs of New York betraktades som ett "originellt manus" för 75th Academy Awards och 56 BAFTAs ?

    
uppsättning Edward Oliver 19.03.2015 06:09

2 svar

13

Eftersom det var "inspirerat" av det, inte "baserat" på det. Herbert Asbury's bok (som du nämnde i ditt citat) är non-fiction. Det handlade om den verkliga och historiska Gangs of New York. Nu var filmen helt fiktiv, bara löst efter de verkliga historiska händelserna (som Asbury inte skrev utan rapporterade ), så det anses vara ett fristående manus, inte en anpassning.

    
svaret ges 19.03.2015 06:29
8

Julia Turner at Slate hade samma fråga tillbaka i februari 2003:

Jay Cocks, a longtime Scorsese collaborator and one of film's three credited writers, told Explainer that most of the script was an original creation: "This is a world we conjured out of whole cloth, out of a whole lot of unassimilated historical research." He says Asbury's book, which Cocks and Scorcese discovered in the late '70s, served primarily as an introduction to the history of the draft riots. The writers borrowed only a few particularly pungent gang names (including the Dead Rabbits and the Plug Uglies), the sketchy outlines of two key characters (Bill the Butcher and Monk McGinn), and Asbury's "great title" from the book. The rest, he says, was original, with guidance from about 50 historical sources.

Of course, the decision isn't up to Jay Cocks. The writers branch of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences determines which scripts count as an original screenplay and which count as an adapted screenplay. When making its decision, the committee considers the sources in question, interviews given about the movie, and the film's publicity materials. They also consider how the Writers Guild of America classified the film for its awards, although they sometimes make a different call. (The WGA also classified Gangs as an original work.)

Miramax säger detsamma:

The adaptation was so loosely based on the book, however, the script was considered for 'Best Original Screenplay' at the 2002 Oscars instead of 'Best Adapted Screenplay'. [...] Scorsese's first cut of Gangs was over four hours long. He's the first to admit that his broad adaptation and final cut did not cover all of the events of the time and said, "this is based on history, there's no doubt about it. But it is still a film that is more of an opera than history."

[...]

Scorsese's characters were either entirely fictional, like Jenny Everdeen played by Cameron Diaz, Amsterdam Vallon played by Leonardo DiCaprio and Priest Vallon played by Liam Neeson or they were fictionalized versions of real people like Bill 'The Butcher' Cutting played by Daniel Day-Lewis.

    
svaret ges 19.03.2015 15:42