Varför accepterade de fortfarande Deckard i familjen, även efter vad han gjort i tidigare filmer?

2

Så i slutet av Furious of the Furious för de av er som inte vet, blev Deckard Shaw accepterad i familjen av Dom efter att dom sade att han var en del av ett "brödraskap". Även om Deckard räddade Doms son, varför trodde de så mycket negativ historia skulle kunna återbetalas med den här akten?

Efter Tokyo Drift lär vi oss att Han dödades av Deckard. Så författarna är uppenbarligen okej med en familjemedlems mördare (eller två om du vill överväga Giseles död) för att bli glömd och förlåtad genom att dom delar sin mest värderade egenskapsfamilj.

Jag skulle vilja veta vad andra tycker att resonemanget bakom detta beslut var. Jag gillar Jason Statham lika mycket som nästa kille, men jag känner fortfarande att det borde ha tagit en annan tomt för att utveckla en äkta familjeband.

    
uppsättning Meju 19.05.2017 05:34

1 svar

1

Enligt screenwriteren för filmerna, Chris Morgan, förväntade de sig denna "face turn" för Shaw att generera en liten kontrovers.

Länk till artikeln men relevanta delar kopieras nedan :

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: You joined the franchise writing the screenplay for Tokyo Drift, the movie that introduced Han. When we first met Deckard, he was killing Han. How did you guys decide to turn his character in this film?

CHRIS MORGAN: There are a couple of things I would say. We don’t know his full story yet, so there are things we’re going to learn that I think will be cool when it comes to light.

Beyond that, I would say, Deckard’s character is not that dissimilar from Dom, in certain ways. The reason Dom went to jail in the original film is he did some violence against someone who hurt his family. Deckard’s story is not too far away from that. The reason he comes after our guys in the last film is because he has a similar code, and he looks after family. So at least there are some markers in there for these two guys. That felt like you might be able to turn him, in a way that you could start understanding what his motivations were.

I’ve got to tell you, I love him in this movie. I love him and Dwayne. I love the way he relates to the team.

och

EW: When you guys initially brought him on in the last couple of movies, was there always some notion of flipping him from an antagonist to joining up with the team?

CM: Bringing Jason into the franchise, we always had an understanding. His character is a man with a code, and he believes in it, and he has a lot of similarities to Dom.

There are things, as developers, that we know about the character that you guys, the audience, do not know. We have the luxury of getting to that. I think people will be surprised and interested in it. This movie gets to a little bit more about who he is, and we learn a lot of new things about him.

I think the response will be that, because of what happened to Han, there is going to be a residual drama and tension. We’re going to lean into that. We haven’t forgotten about it. We’re going to investigate all of that. But also, you can see, in this film, a little more in [Deckard’s] core, as well. I know it’s a little unsettling, I know it’s a little different. Maybe the audience isn’t expecting it. I think it’s all, in the end, going to be a really exciting, fun, valuable experience. They’ll come to understand.

Det låter som den kommande filmen, som förmodligen inkluderar Hobbs och Shaw spinoff kommer att gå in i mer detaljer kring karaktären och ge mer inblick i den nya "team" -dynamiken. Dessutom sparade Torettons son definitivt honom en hel massa brownie-poäng.

    
svaret ges 09.01.2019 17:19