Efter att ha grävt lite, är här vad jag fick reda på.
Detta hände under 2012:
Moore alleges in a lawsuit that Kirkman, a childhood friend with whom he collaborated on several comics, tricked him into surrendering his rights to them in 2005 in exchange for payments that never came. Kirkman calls the allegations "ridiculous."
Några mer extrakt från samma källa, betona min:
He said self-publishing "Battle Pope" with Moore helped him find other artists' online and win their trust.
"Because I had gotten 'Battle Pope' published, when I went to people online and I was like, 'Hey I've got this thing'… I seemed somewhat legit, despite not being legit at all," he said, with a large dose of self-deprecation. "So they trusted me and I was able to do that and people would agree to do books with me."
He added: "But it's very hard if you haven't done that, because there's hundreds of people that are contacting artists that are on… different websites all the time going, 'Hey, you want to do a book with me?' And you don't know who that guy is, and a lot of times artists get screwed where peole are like, 'Oh, let's do a book together and I'll pay you or I won't pay you… people are a little squirelly."
He ended by repeating his proven laugh line: "So I would advise trickery and deceit."
Moore said he agreed to sign over his rights to his collaborations in exchange for a cut of their earnings. But he said he has not received the earnings, or been allowed to look over Kirkman's books, as they had agreed in a 2005 contract.
Läser mellan linjerna, jag tror att Kirkman, som var en barndomsvän av Moore, arbetade med honom som konstnär i början för att han inte hade något annat val. Men när hans legitimitet växte (från att själv publicera en viss bok) sökte han efter andra artister.
Så jag tror att den verkliga frågan inte är "Varför ersatte Adlard Moore" men "Varför ville Kirkman vilja Moore ut?" Jag fortsätter att gräva.