In "Expansen", varför är isen samlad med stora fraktfartyg, inte dronor?

12

I TV-serien "The Expanse", i det första avsnittet, ca 12 minuter in, ser vi istrawleren Canterbury samlar stora bitar av is som last och skickar dem till Ceres.

Samlingsarbetet görs av dronor och kranar.

Varför laddar de även isen i ett skepp, istället för att skicka det direkt med användningen av dronerna hela vägen till Ceres?

Jag antar att det här skulle vara mycket mer kostnadseffektivt, än mindre mindre farligt.

    
uppsättning hitchhiker 15.12.2016 21:39

3 svar

11

Eftersom dronor inte skapar övertygande tecken.

Författarna adresserade faktiskt exakt detta i en annan intervju (ja, en reddit AMA) idag :

Q: To the extent that your books about the future reflect the times we're living in now, they are provocative and fascinating and an awesome read. What sorts of things that happen in the expanse do you really think will happen in the future, and what sorts of things are a reflection of our time and maybe you don't really think will work out that way? Will we always be at war with each other? Will there always be religion? Most importantly to me, do you really think the food will suck? I feel great sympathy every time someone has to drink crappy fungus-based whiskey. I'm kind of hoping we figure out how to make test-tube proteins and hydroponic vegetables taste good.

A: As long as we are recognizably human we'll have war and religion, I think. Space mining is more likely to be robots rather than people, but mining robots are harder to make into compelling characters. I think by the time we have to make fungal whisky, we won't be thinking about how gross that is.

    
svaret ges 26.01.2017 20:46
10

Eftersom det är så som James S. Corey ville ha det.

Expansen är inte svår science fiction där allt måste vetenskapligt förklaras, förstås eller ens grundas på verklig fysik.

OrbitBooks

OB - Leviathan Wakes (the first book in The Expanse series) has a gritty and realistic feel. How much research did you do on the technology side of things, and how important was it to you that they be realistic and accurate?

JC - Okay, so what you’re really asking me there is if this is hard science fiction. The answer is an emphatic no. I have nothing but respect for well written hard science fiction, and I wanted everything in the book to be plausible enough that it doesn’t get in the way. But the rigorous how-to with the math shown? It’s not that story. This is working man’s science fiction.

It’s like in Alien, we meet the crew of the Nostromo doing their jobs in this very blue collar environment. They’re truckers, right? Why is there a room in the Nostromo where water leaks down off of chains suspended from the ceiling? Because it looks cool and makes the world feel a little messy. It gives you the feel of the world. Ridley Scott doesn’t explain why that room exists, and when most people watch the film, it never even occurs to them to ask. What kind of drive does the Nostromo use? I bet no one walked out of the film asking that question. I wanted to tell a story about humans living and working in a well populated solar system. I wanted to convey a feeling for what that would be like, and then tell a story about the people who live there.

    
svaret ges 15.12.2016 23:07
1

Det är inte meningslöst i första hand; Ceres består av 17% till 27% vattenis, men vi har verkligen bara känt detta sedan 2015, och Leviathan Wakes kom ut 2011.

    
svaret ges 19.02.2017 22:48