Are där intellektuella fördelar som favoriserar visning av stjärntur [stängt]

-4

Är det kulturellt relevant i den utsträckning att det vederbörligen skulle locka till sig vetenskapligt erkännande. Passar både TOS, TNG, DS9 regeln för detta? Har showen inspirerade moderna forskare från den nuvarande tiden att komma in på fältet ?? Om så är fallet, hur kan detta mätas kvantitativt [som i den totala effektmätningen]. (Mer detaljer: Att den filmade serien inte är primärt avsedd för den allmänna TV-entusiasten, relevans som sträcker sig bortom den stora lekmännens publik.)

    
uppsättning Quenzdlophus 30.03.2016 00:18

1 svar

4

Visserligen har Star Trek inspirerat människor att bedriva karriär inom naturvetenskap

Du frågar, "Har visarna inspirerade moderna forskare från den nuvarande tiden att komma in i fältet ??" Svaret är absolut ja .

Betong exempel:

  • Astrophysicist Candy Torres citerar Star Trek som en av anledningarna till att hon blev forskare (läs mer här )

Weaned on the vision of an enlightened spacefaring society that "Star Trek" offered, and inspired by President John F. Kennedy's call to put an American on the moon, Torres dedicated herself at an early age to working in the space program.

"It was easy to aspire to a future like that where people got along regardless of race or religion, just because they were human. Being a lifelong 'Star Trek' fan made me see the space program not just as sci-fi, but as a positive vision of the future, at a time when we desperately needed those positive visions."

  • Novelist R.C. Davison , författare till Orbital Maneuvers , följde en grad i fysik på grund av Star Trek och Mr Spock i synnerhet (läs mer here )

TV offered a few programs that were on during the time I was allowed to watch it: Twilight Zone (Scared me.), Outer Limits (Scared me even more!), Lost in Space (Wanted to be part of the Robinson family.), Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea (Interesting, but every week it was a new monster trying to destroy the sub.), Land of the Giants (Didn’t get to watch this one too much.) and the one that blew them all away—Star Trek! (Ahhh!) The technology, the characters and the special effects mesmerized me. (Yes, special effects. Don’t laugh! Taken in the context of TV sci-fi programs in the sixties, Star Trek was a quantum leap above the rest.)

I found myself particularly fascinated with Mr. Spock—the pure intellect, the cool, emotionless logic and the apparent mastery of everything having to do with science and math. Mr. Spock was my inspiration to pursue a career in the sciences. Star Trek, coupled with the fervor growing with the Apollo Space Program, and the goal of landing on the Moon by the end of the decade, fueled my desire to be out there exploring The Final Frontier.

  • Professor Philip Kesten av Santa Clara University inspirerades att bli fysiker av Star Trek och lär nu en kurs "Physics of Star Trek" vid universitetet (läs mer här )

“What we’re doing in the Physics of Star Trek is literally peeling back a little piece of science that seems interesting and seeing how deeply we can go into it. I started the term by looking at the solar system and then the galaxy and the universe, because, hey, what is Star Trek really about? It’s going where no man has gone before. So, what’s out there? And once we understand what’s out there we can understand why we want to go there and how we’re going to get there. So that led me to look at, say, the development of warp drive. But if you don’t understand how far away Vulcan is, why would you care about warp drive? So it all has to hang together. It has to hang together the same way a Star Trek story does, and I’m telling them a story, essentially.”

    
svaret ges 30.03.2016 00:23