Få ett kinesiskt turistvisum med en utdöd brittisk övertygelse i Storbritannien

8

En grupp av oss reser till Kina i år. En av medlemmarna i vår grupp dömdes för fem år sedan för besittning av Ecstasy; Som det har varit fem år är övertygelsen nu förbrukad / utgått. Kommer denna utdömda övertygelse att påverka våra chanser att få visum?

    
uppsättning zeocrash 29.06.2011 01:21

3 svar

7

Begärde en vän om den som ansökte år sedan. Han nekades trots att hans övertygelse spenderades. Det kan baseras på hans övertygelsens allvar, men det kan jag inte påstå.

Det bästa rådet jag fick var att gå till Hong Kong och ansöka om en kinesisk visum där. Enligt källor (andra resenärer, inget skrivet), är du mer benägna att få en där. Om du inte vill gå hela vägen till Hong Kong för att försöka (vilket är förståeligt), sök och se om han får en.

    
svaret ges 12.07.2011 12:20
3

Enligt min bästa förståelse är den "utlösta" övertygelsen endast relevant när den behandlas inom Förenade kungariket.

Från lagen:

4 Effect of rehabilitation.

(1)Subject to sections 7 and 8 below, a person who has become a rehabilitated person for the purposes of this Act in respect of a conviction shall be treated for all purposes in law as a person who has not committed or been charged with or prosecuted for or convicted of or sentenced for the offence or offences which were the subject of that conviction; and, notwithstanding the provisions of any other enactment or rule of law to the contrary, but subject as aforesaid— .

  • (a)no evidence shall be admissible in any proceedings before a judicial authority exercising its jurisdiction or functions in Great Britain to prove that any such person has committed or been charged with or prosecuted for or convicted of or sentenced for any offence which was the subject of a spent conviction; and .
  • (b)a person shall not, in any such proceedings, be asked, and, if asked, shall not be required to answer, any question relating to his past which cannot be answered without acknowledging or referring to a spent conviction or spent convictions or any circumstances ancillary thereto. .

(2)Subject to the provisions of any order made under subsection (4) below, where a question seeking information with respect to a person's previous convictions, offences, conduct or circumstances is put to him or to any other person otherwise than in proceedings before a judicial authority— .

  • (a)the question shall be treated as not relating to spent convictions or to any circumstances ancillary to spent convictions, and the answer thereto may be framed accordingly; and .
  • (b)the person questioned shall not be subjected to any liability or otherwise prejudiced in law by reason of any failure to acknowledge or disclose a spent conviction or any circumstances ancillary to a spent conviction in his answer to the question. .

(3)Subject to the provisions of any order made under subsection (4) below,— .

  • (a)any obligation imposed on any person by any rule of law or by the provisions of any agreement or arrangement to disclose any matters to any other person shall not extend to requiring him to disclose a spent conviction or any circumstances ancillary to a spent conviction (whether the conviction is his own or another's) ; and .
  • (b)a conviction which has become spent or any circumstances ancillary thereto, or any failure to disclose a spent conviction or any such circumstances, shall not be a proper ground for dismissing or excluding a person from any office, profession, occupation or employment, or for prejudicing him in any way in any occupation or employment. .

(4)The Secretary of State may by order— .

  • (a)make such provision as seems to him appropriate for excluding or modifying the application of either or both of paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection (2) above in relation to questions put in such circumstances as may be specified in the order; .

  • (b)provide for such exceptions from the provisions of subsection (3) above as seem to him appropriate, in such cases or classes of case, and in relation to convictions of such a description, as may be specified in the order. .

(5)For the purposes of this section and section 7 below any of the following are circumstances ancillary to a conviction, that is to say— .

  • (a)the offence or offences which were the subject of that conviction; .

  • (b)the conduct constituting that offence or those offences; .

and

  • (c)any process or proceedings preliminary to that conviction, any sentence imposed in respect of that conviction, any proceedings (whether by way of appeal or otherwise) for reviewing that conviction or any such sentence, and anything done in pursuance of or undergone in compliance with any such sentence. .

(6)For the purposes of this section and section 7 below " proceedings before a judicial authority " includes, in addition to proceedings before any of the ordinary courts of law, proceedings before any tribunal, body or person having power— .

  • (a)by virtue of any enactment, law, custom or practice ; .

  • (b)under the rules governing any association, institution, profession, occupation or employment; or .

  • (c)under any provision of an agreement providing for arbitration with respect to questions arising thereunder; to determine any question affecting the rights, privileges, obligations or liabilities of any person, or to receive evidence affecting the determination of any such question.

Implikationen av detta innebär att när någon gör en bakgrundskontroll på dig kommer övertygelsen att komma upp. Men om det inte är specifikt uteslutet enligt lag kan det inte användas mot dig av någon som omfattas av brittisk lag och denna handling. Saken är kinesiska är inte föremål för brittisk lag när du granskar visumansökan för att komma in i Kina.

    
svaret ges 05.02.2014 22:55
-1

Jag kommer inte att råda någon att börja ljuga på sina viseringsansökningar ... men det är värt att komma ihåg att, om du inte är på Interpol-vaktlistan eller något, kommer den kinesiska ambassaden inte att få tillgång till Storbritannien kriminalregister.

    
svaret ges 05.02.2014 23:36