Does J.K. Rowling förnekar att skriva fantasi?

29

Från den här artikeln (om den senaste protesten från SFF-författare mot BBC: s diskriminerande beteende).

JK Rowling sadly felt she had to deny she was writing fantasy with her Harry Potter series – although as Terry Pratchett responded: “I would have thought that the wizards, witches, trolls, unicorns, hidden worlds, jumping chocolate frogs, owl mail, magic food, ghosts, broomsticks and spells would have given her a clue?”

Kan någon hänvisa till detta? Var detta för att hon inte ville märka hennes verk som fantasi?

    
uppsättning apoorv020 23.04.2011 22:11

4 svar

23

J. K. Rowling har sagt att hon inte gillar fantasi, och det hände inte för henne att Harry Potter var fantasi tills efter hon hade skrivit den, enligt en 2005 intervju med Time Magazine .

The most popular living fantasy writer in the world doesn't even especially like fantasy novels. It wasn't until after Sorcerer's Stone was published that it even occurred to her that she had written one. "That's the honest truth," she says. "You know, the unicorns were in there. There was the castle, God knows. But I really had not thought that that's what I was doing. And I think maybe the reason that it didn't occur to me is that I'm not a huge fan of fantasy." Rowling has never finished The Lord of the Rings. She hasn't even read all of C.S. Lewis' Narnia novels, which her books get compared to a lot.

...

Hang on--other things? It's disconcerting to think of Rowling stepping out on Harry and the gang with another set of characters. But at least we can say Harry is Rowling's last wizard. From here on out, it's Muggles only. "I think I can say categorically that I will not write another fantasy after Harry," she says, making herself and her publicists, who hover nearby, visibly nervous. "Wait, now I'm panicking. Oh, my God! Yes, I'm sure I can say that. I think I will have exhausted the possibilities of that. For me." Beyond that, she isn't giving away many clues, but she's approaching the project with her usual ruthless skepticism. "We'll have to see if it's good enough to be published. I mean, that is a real concern, obviously, because the first thing I write post Harry could be absolutely dreadful, and, you know, people will buy it. So, you know, you're left with this real insecurity."

    
svaret ges 23.04.2011 22:38
19

Från Electronic Telegraph , 1997:

Yet she [JK Rowling] says that fantasy doesn't greatly appeal to her.

"I don't read it; and it feels odd to speak of what I've written as fantasy. It's all set obviously in a very fantastical context, but some of the characters I think we've all met. Harry has no parents to love; his affections and loyalties are to his friends, but there are adults around who he feels might be his parents. I'm far more interested in those ideas."

Från Australian , 1998 :

These days well-meaning people give Rowling fantasy books to read. But she prefers Jane Austen and Roddy Doyle. "Fantasy is not my favourite genre. Although I love C. S. Lewis, I have a problem with his imitators."

Från Newsweek , 2000:

"In fact, I don't really like fantasy. It's not so much that I don't like it, I really haven't read a lot of it. <...> It didn't occur to me for quite a while that I was writing fantasy when I'd started "Harry Potter," because I'm a bit slow on the uptake about those things. I was so caught up in it. And I was about two thirds of the way through, and I suddenly thought, This has got unicorns in it. I'm writing fantasy!"

Från AOL Live Chat , 2001:

Q: Why did you focus on magic?

JKR: It chose me. I never really sat down & thought 'what shall I focus on' and in fact, I don't really read fantasy; it's not my favourite genre.

Intervju med Steven Kloves , som skrev Harry Potter filmskript, Skrivet av , 2001:

"I confessed to Jo right away that I wasn't a fan of fantasy," he says. "She said, 'Relax, neither am I.'"

För 2005, förutom The Times artikeln som nämns ovan, finns det ett transkript av ITV presskonferens där hon säger:

JK Rowling: That is one thing I can definitely rule out I don't think I will write any more fantasy books. The reason for that, obviously I have now written a huge long fantasy which will be longer when it is finished and I think I have really put my best fantasy ideas into Harry Potter and if I try to write another fantasy I would feel it was second best. And I love the characters I have written in Harry Potter so much, maybe it will feel like a slight betrayal if I did a second fantasy. I would like to just, that to be my one and only brave stab at that genre, I think.

    
svaret ges 11.09.2011 20:54
5

Det är faktiskt ett välkänt faktum att många författare som arbetar i genre av fantasi eller science fiction inte nödvändigtvis ser sig själva som science fiction / fantasy författare; och istället skriva om människor, idéer, historia och filosofi etc ...; med sci-fi / fantasi är bara plot enheter som de använder.

Bland de mest kända av dessa är:

  • Stanislaw Lem

  • Bröder Strugatsky (vilken betydelse för sovjetisk sci-fi kan anses om Heinlein + Asimov sätta ihop)

  • Går längre tillbaka, Bulgakov och ännu mer Gogol.

  • Och går ännu längre, heck, varför inte Homer?

svaret ges 24.04.2011 00:51
-3

Hon nekade att skriva fantasi eftersom Harry Potter inte är fantasi.

    
svaret ges 13.08.2017 23:34